Below are the 13 most recent journal entries.
for any still interested in Elaion..
Elaion's public discussion list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Hellenic_Recons/
The message behind the cut was recently posted (by me) on Elaion's public discussion list, 'Hellenic_Recons'. ( Read more...Collapse )
(x-posted, but not across the entire planet)
Greek Ethics Pt.2: Timé, Kléos, Aidos and Xenia
In addition to the Four (or Five) Cardinal Virtues, Greek ethics also held other values. The main ones were Eusebia, Kléos, Timé, and Xenia.
One that has already been mentioned is that of Moderation, or keeping to the Mean or the Middle Path. This is, not in itself unique to Hellenismos. One of the Confucian Classics is the Great Mean, and Chinese philosophy traditionally also valued Té or Virtue, (often divided into Five Cardinal Virtues as well); while Buddhism also valued the Middle Path as well.
Eusebia (piety) has been mentioned in the discussion of virtues as one possible Fifth Cardinal Virtue. Like the other virtues, the Hellenes viewed eusebia as a mean between two extremes. At one extreme was aesebia or impiety, which in essence meant failure to participate in or perform the traditional rituals of worship to the Gods, Demigods, Nature Spirits, Heroes and Ancestors. These were usually public rituals, done by the community or the locality or the clan. Rarely was belief contrary to the accepted tradition criticized. Anaxagoras and Socrates both were put on trial by Athens for their teachings. Socrates was also satirized savagly by Aristophanes in The Clouds.
On the other hnad, at the other extreme was excessive piety, which came in for as much criticism as insufficient piety. Those who spent too much time fearing the Gods, or worrying that something they had done had offended the Gods, or spent all their free time praying at the altars, or attending to the divine images constantly, adjusting the offered peploi and the like led some to make the witty remark that "the Gods do not need bodyservants." This excessive devotion or fear was derided as deisidaimonia, literally "fear of the spirits (or Gods)" which meant, and is translated as superstition (via the Latin equivalent term of superstitio.
So one should be mindful of the Gods and their gifts, and make the appropriate prayers and propitiations. But one should not abase oneself (which is why one stands when praying, rather than kneeling). The relationship with the Gods is not one of ignoring or denying them, nor is it one of excessive and slavish abasement and adoration. One stands in relation to the Gods as a free person, dealing with a free person of higher status.
Another value of great importance was the related values of Timé, Kléos (Honor and Fame) and Aidos (Shame).
The film, Troy did get the desire for fame very well. One tried to do acts that would be remembered by the community and others. The warriors at Troy, to the extent that one believes they existed have won fame that has lasted three thousand years. In the ancient world, people still came, as late as the time of the Emperor Julian to the Tombs and Shrines of those heroes. Even now, people visit (W)Ilios in large part of the enduring fame of Akhilleus, Odysseus, Hektor, Aineas, Agammemnon and the others. Successful people were rewarded by poems in their memory, statues erected by their cities and the like. This classical value still persists in some areas strongly influenced by classical civilization. To this day, if you ask Latin Americans (males, primarily) if they'd rather be written into the Empyrean Lamb's Book of Life or have a street named after them, or a statue erected to them in Central Park, they will, almost without fail, seek Kléos and Timé over Christian Salvation, if forced to make the choice. How do they seek to gain these statues and fame? By excellence in their actions, demonstrating skill, bravery, etc.
Honor was also an important value. By doing great deeds that helped the community, not only did they win memories for themselves, but also win honors. Until recently, with the rise of individualistic and internalized ethics, honor was not something internal. We can console ourselves today that we acted with honor. And I'm sure to an extent, an ancient Greek could console himself in that manner. But in essense, honor is something granted by the community. It is community recognition for one's actions and accomplishments and skills. Over and over again, I would read how one sought honors from the community so they could claim honor. Growing up in our internalized guilt-oriented modern world this made no sense, until I examined other modern socieities. Once again, my Latino heritage explained it via a survival of classical values there, and I confirmed this by other studies of the ancient world.
Ancient Greece was an honor-shame society, much as modern Italy, Sicily, Spain and Latin America are (as is China, Japan and the Middle East). Honor is granted by society, and so one is considered honored by the honors granted by one's community and one's peers. One is jealous of the honor one gains, as one may lose it based on community reactions. In more modern sense, to lose honor is to lose face. Certain types of action are considered as acting with honor, and society recognizes that and says you have honor, often giving a title.
Hence Akhilleus' negatie reaction to the claim of Agamemnon to Briseis, espcially as it was done in front of the army entire. He lost face by that action, and Agamemnon's claim that the army did not need the courage and skill (andreia) of Akhilleus. So Akhilleus sulked in his tent for being dishonored. We normally think of Akhilleus as acting childishly here. But he wasn't. He states his intention to go on strike and prove how the army needs him, to restore his honor in the eyes of the army, and to have it restored to him publicly. He plans on shaming Agamemnon, and he eventually succeeds. Without Akhilleus, not only can the Akhaiwoi army fail to conquer Wilios, it can hardly defend its own ships.
Aidos, or shame, is also a public thing, granted by the public. People shame you, or expect you to feel shame by their reaction to you. One is then ashamed, and not honored. Rather than an internal (guilt) response, it is a public response often resulting in ostracism and shunning. In Spanish there is the phrase "sin vergüernza" (without shame). To be without shame, or shameless is a bad thing, as a lack of shame means you don't care what others think and will act in a socially negative manner. Its as if one is guiltless despite of how one acts, i.e., a sociopath.
So the overall effect is to encourage people to engage in socially positive manners, and so gain Timé and avoid socially negative manners and so avoid accumulating excessive aidos or shame.
The last major value that Hellenic society preferred value is Xenia or hospitality. One was expected to offer hospitality (food, drink, shelter) to suppliants (beggars or prisoners), strangers and the like. Offering hospitality created a bond with one's guest. The guest was expected to behave, and treat the host well, and the host had to treat the guest well, and protect the host. It formed a sacred bond of guest-friendship, as the guest was obligated to reciprocate if the host ever needed anything.
The most dramatic form of this hospitality came in the ritual of hekatitia. If someone grasped one's knees in supplication, one had to provide protection to this supplicant. Usually this was someone you had bested in battle. It meant one had a duty to protect the person until they were ransomed (if a prisoner). Less extreme versions were more common.
Failure to provide shelter, or protection could be very bad. If one broke the bonds of guest-friendship, by stealing from or abusing one's host, one had broken a key bond of society, and became an outcast. Paris violated this bond seriously by stealing Menelaos' wife, Helen, and sparked a war. The suitors were poor guests, and paid for it with their lives when Odysseus returned to Ithaka. On the other hand, poor hosts, such as the Kuklopes could be harmed by their guests in retaliation.
Failure to respect Hekatitia or supplicants could also be very serious. Agamemnon fails to respond properly to Khryses' petition to return his captive daughter. As a result of the abuse Agamemnon heaps on the old priest, Apollon punishes the Akhaian camp. When Akhilleus refuses to honor the hekatitia a Trojan prince performs on the banks of the Scamander river, the River God attacks Akhilleus to punish his inhospitality and pride. On the other hand, when Priam comes to ask for the body of Hektor, Akhilleus receives the old King graciously and with the proper respect for a suppliant and returns the body. (The Iliad opens with Agamemnon's inhospitality, and closes with Akhilleus' hospitality a neat contrast; much as the Odyssey contrasts the poor hosts, the Kuklopes with the good hosts, of Scheria, the good guests of Odysseus's men versus the poor guests of the suitors).
Thus we can see the importance placed on piety, honor, shame, glory/fame and hospitality in ancient Hellas. We can also see how moral lessons were contained in the Epic poems of Homer which serve as exemplars and cautionary tales.
Greek Ethics Pt. 1 The Virtues
Commodus: You wrote me once that the four virtues of a man were wisdom, justice, fortitude and temperance. As I read this I knew I had none of them. But I have ambition, that can be a virtue sometimes, resourcefulness, courage, maybe not on the battlefield but there are many forms of courage, and devotion, to my family, to you. But none of my virtues were on your list..
The ancient Greek Philosophers such as Socrates, Plato and Aristotle studied the traditional ethics of their society and came up with a set of virtues or habits of character that were pretty much universally agreed upon. In Hellas, virtue or arete meant excellence, especially excellence regarding the end or goal of a thing. The excellence of a knife is the cutting and how well it did that. The excellence of a human being is the fulfilling of a human's end or goal. So they looked at what characteristics made someone excellent in their society. ( Read more...Collapse )
A partial response to kallistos and others
We speak of “reconstructing” ancient religions. What does that mean exactly? “Religion” in the ancient sense is a euphemism we use to describe a complex web of related cults conducted across a variety of social levels. These cults of the ancient world can not be fully appreciated outside the particular social level in which they operated. Any attempt to reconstruct those cults would have to consider the relevance of a social level’s circumstances to our modern world. ( Read more...Collapse )
Lookinf for a book review
I was wondering if anyone has seen, read or have an opinion on KHARIS: Hellenic Polytheism Explored by Sarah Kate Istra Winter, also known as Oenochoe? Here is the website for the book http://www.winterscapes.com/kharis/.
The following was an essay I did on my private journal regarding ten broad requirements for both Greek and Roman polytheisms. The opinions are my own, but as some of my Elaion comrades largely agreed with it, I thought I would reprint it here. ( Read more...Collapse )
Hermes the Thief!
Very brief book review ( Read more...Collapse )
The reason for Kouretes Mysteries
This is an editied version of something I posted in ursus77 journal. I post it here for all(or more) people to see.
In light of the recent essay on reviving the mysteries. I should explain why I am interested in creating new "mysteries" inspired by the Kouretes. The Kouretes seem to embody something I think is needed. More on that in a moment.
I feel that the mysteries have their place within the context of communal worship. Walter Burkert in Greek Religion does a very good job of explaining how various mystery traditions fit into the communal worship of the Ancient Greeks. He does this by going into some of what we know of some of the female mysteries. I don't have the book with me so I cannot comment which ones he covers.
In my opinion he shows that the initiate mysteries could initiate hand in hand with communal worship. On a certain level it seems like some of the ancient mysteries were like Mens breakfast's that some Christian Churches have today. I went with my Dad sometimes when I was younger. It was mostly older men talking about work, family, sports or other "guy stuff".
I think most people get to hung up on the word mysteries. I don't think the mysteries have to be all about hoc us pocas. They can fulfill the needs of a community or part of a community that requires a narrower focus.
My vision for reviving or creating anew the Kouretes Mysteries is because I feel the modern definition of what it means to be a man causes problems. Men today get a lot of conflicting messages about what it means to be a man. He must be stoic, hide his feelings, into sports and in general be a hard(physically, emotionally and spiritually). This I feel is out of touch with the ancient view of what it meant to be a man. In addition this is not a healthy way for a man to be in today's age.
I think something like a new or revived Kouretes Mysteries or something like it is VERY needed. It would give us a chance to explore through history, introspection and experience what we are and what we can or perhaps should be.
You had the womens movement doing these sorts of things in the 1970's. I think it is time men had a place to do some of the same things.
This is an area where revivals of the mysteries can do good for the moder person and be in keeping with the ancient traditions as well. What I take issue with are those who would use the revival of the ancient mysteries for their own ego, power trips or to fill some psychological/spiritual void.
On the Mysteries
winegodeatsyou argued that we cannot recreate the Mysteries and should not try. Since they're cracking down at work on net access, I wrote something of a reply over my lunch break.
Here it is:
( Read more...Collapse )
For reading enjoyment, discussion, etc...
Posted recently on Hellenic_Recons by Mike, also viewable at: http://www.templeofdemeter.com/pentecostal.html
"Until recently, I've avoided most Hellenic email lists, for the simple matter that I have no stomach for watching the same topics go around on an endless six-monthly carousel. A few weeks ago, I joined one ‘online thiasos', and began grinding my teeth at the barrage of emails on ‘suggestions for developing a relationship with God X'.
"Call me crazy, but I don't remember Odysseus fretting over the state of his ‘relationship' with Athena, or Hercules establishing a regime of devotional activities to build an emotional bridge to Hera. ( Read more...Collapse )
Thought for the Day
Elaion types often encounter ethnic Greeks who argue that Greek religion should be for Greeks. Or at least that ethnic Greek pagans are somehow purer and closer to the source than non-Ethnic Greek pagans, despite the prevalance of Orphic and other fringe cult practices in many ethnic Greek pagan groups.
I thought this quote nicely summarizes my opinion on the whole ethnic issue:
"Nothing comparable to the virulent color prejudice of modern times existed in the ancient world. The ancients did not fall into the error of biological racism; black skin color was not a sign of inferiority. Greeks and Romans did not establish color as an obstacle to integration in society. An ancient society was one that for all its faults and failures never made color the basis for judging a man."
Frank Snowden Jr
Why Not All Gods Are Cut From The Same Cloth
Author’s note: The following is a modification of an essay that originally appeared at http://www.unrv.com/culture/apollo.php . This was in response to a discussion on Greco-Roman religion wherein someone stated that all gods and all religions were ultimately the same, and therefore religious and cultural differences were irrelevant. The essay has been very slightly adapted for an Elaion friendly audience.
Everything is open to interpretation and certainly other individuals may emphasize different aspects of Apollo. I however believe the interpretation of Apollo as offered by Walter Otto, which served as the inspiration for this essay, is the one best in keeping with the whole of Greco-Roman religious thought and tradition. I claim no special relationship to Apollo. I desire not to be his priest or seer. I can only claim a certain knowledge of history and a sincere devotion to the god and his place in our civilization. I furthermore believe that these two qualities are all that is needed and wanted in modern day cults - a sentiment best expressed by the ideals of "piety, tradition and honour."
( Read more...Collapse )
Still waiting for more people to show up here, but I just wanted to open by saying welcome, and also to share a couple of my favorite online sources! ( Read more...Collapse )